written by Rene K. Mueller, Copyright (c) 2005, 2006, 2007, last updated Tue, January 29, 2019
Overview of Variants
Since the possibilities are so vast I have selected a couple of platonic and archimedean solids - as I previously studied in Geodesic Polyhedra - which seem reasonable for dome constructions,
and created variants with up 1000 struts, and max 30 different strut lengths. So, these are the results:
Icosahedron-based Geodesic Domes
1V 2/3 25 struts(1 kind)
2V 65 struts(2 kinds)
3V 4/9 120 struts(3 kinds)
3V 5/9 165 struts(3 kinds)
4V 250 struts(6 kinds)
L3 250 struts(5 kinds)
5V 7/15 350 struts(9 kinds)
5V 8/15 425 struts(9 kinds)
6V 555 struts(9 kinds)
2V.3V 555 struts(10 kinds)
7V 10/21 700 struts(15 kinds)
7V 11/21 805 struts(15 kinds)
8V 980 struts(19 kinds)
L4 980 struts(14 kinds)
Octahedron-based Geodesic Domes
1V 8 struts(1 kind)
2V 28 struts(2 kinds)
3V 60 struts(3 kinds)
4V 104 struts(6 kinds)
L3 104 struts(5 kinds)
L3 3/8 60 struts(5 kinds)
L3 5/8 144 struts(5 kinds)
5V 160 struts(9 kinds)
6V 228 struts(9 kinds)
2V.3V 228 struts(10 kinds)
3V.2V 228 struts(7 kinds)
7V 308 struts(16 kinds)
8V 400 struts(20 kinds)
L4 400 struts(15 kinds)
L4 7/16 308 struts(15 kinds)
L4 9/16 488 struts(15 kinds)
9V 504 struts(18 kinds)
3V.3V 504 struts(15 kinds)
10V 620 struts(30 kinds)
2V.5V 620 struts(28 kinds)
5V.2V 620 struts(24 kinds)
Cube-based Geodesic Domes
1V 21 struts(2 kinds)
2V 78 struts(4 kinds)
3V 171 struts(10 kinds)
4V 300 struts(14 kinds)
L3 300 struts(11 kinds)
5V 465 struts(21 kinds)
6V 666 struts(29 kinds)
2V.3V 666 struts(27 kinds)
3V.2V 666 struts(22 kinds)
7V 903 struts(42 kinds)
Cuboctahedron-based Geodesic Domes
1V 27 struts(2 kinds)
2V 102 struts(5 kinds)
3V 225 struts(10 kinds)
4V 396 struts(18 kinds)
L3 396 struts(15 kinds)
5V 615 struts(28 kinds)
6V 882 struts(36 kinds)
2V.3V 882 struts(34 kinds)
3V.2V 882 struts(28 kinds)
Truncated Octahedron-based Geodesic Domes
1V 60 struts(4 kinds)
2V 228 struts(7 kinds)
3V 504 struts(15 kinds)
4V 888 struts(25 kinds)
L3 888 struts(19 kinds)
Rhombicuboctahedron-based Geodesic Domes
1V 3/8 40 struts(2 kinds)
1V 5/8 88 struts(2 kinds)
2V 3/8 152 struts(5 kinds)
2V 5/8 344 struts(5 kinds)
3V 3/8 336 struts(10 kinds)
3V 5/8 768 struts(10 kinds)
Numerical Overview
In order to assist to overview the options further, consider to study following table carefully, it's worth it.
Types: strut types or amount of different strut lengths, the lesser the better
Variance: strut variance, difference between longest and shortest strut, the lesser the better (more even triangles)
The L-variant is better than the comperable V-variant, in sense of strut variance and amount of different struts.
The list is sorted by the amount of struts, so you can choose how complex the dome should become.
Name
Connectors
Faces
Struts
Types
Variance
Octahedron 1V
5
4
8
1
0%
Cube 1V
10
12
21
2
25.6%
Icosahedron 1V 2/3
11
15
25
1
0%
Cuboctahedron 1V
12
16
27
2
30.7%
Octahedron 2V
13
16
28
2
30.7%
Rhombicuboctahedron 1V 3/8
17
24
40
2
36.5%
Octahedron 3V
25
36
60
3
46.1%
Octahedron L3 3/8
25
36
60
5
48.0%
Truncated Octahedron 1V
25
36
60
4
46.1%
Icosahedron 2V
26
40
65
2
13.1%
Cube 2V
31
48
78
4
37.4%
Rhombicuboctahedron 1V 5/8
33
56
88
2
36.5%
Name
Connectors
Faces
Struts
Types
Variance
Cuboctahedron 2V
39
64
102
5
48.0%
Octahedron 4V
41
64
104
6
80.2%
Octahedron L3
41
64
104
5
48.0%
Icosahedron 3V 4/9
46
75
120
3
18.3%
Octahedron L3 5/8
53
92
144
5
48.0%
Rhombicuboctahedron 2V 3/8
57
96
152
5
44.9%
Octahedron 5V
61
100
160
9
92.9%
Icosahedron 3V 5/9
61
105
165
3
18.3%
Cube 3V
64
108
171
10
50.1%
Cuboctahedron 3V
82
144
225
10
51.2%
Octahedron 2V.3V
85
144
228
10
51.2%
Octahedron 3V.2V
85
144
228
7
53.5%
Name
Connectors
Faces
Struts
Types
Variance
Octahedron 6V
85
144
228
9
95.4%
Truncated Octahedron 2V
85
144
228
7
53.5%
Icosahedron 4V
91
160
250
6
28.3%
Icosahedron L3
91
160
250
5
17.8%
Cube 4V
109
192
300
14
56.9%
Cube L3
109
192
300
11
41.5%
Octahedron 7V
113
196
308
16
107.9%
Octahedron L4 7/16
113
196
308
15
53.8%
Rhombicuboctahedron 3V 3/8
121
216
336
10
46.2%
Rhombicuboctahedron 2V 5/8
121
224
344
5
44.9%
Icosahedron 5V 7/15
126
225
350
9
32.1%
Cuboctahedron 4V
141
256
396
18
60.2%
Name
Connectors
Faces
Struts
Types
Variance
Cuboctahedron L3
141
256
396
15
53.8%
Octahedron 8V
145
256
400
20
112.6%
Octahedron L4
145
256
400
15
53.8%
Icosahedron 5V 8/15
151
275
425
9
32.1%
Cube 5V
166
300
465
21
58.9%
Octahedron L4 9/16
173
316
488
15
53.8%
Octahedron 3V.3V
181
324
504
15
55.1%
Octahedron 9V
181
324
504
18
113.2%
Truncated Octahedron 3V
181
324
504
15
55.1%
Icosahedron 2V.3V
196
360
555
10
18.9%
Icosahedron 6V
196
360
555
9
33.2%
Cuboctahedron 5V
216
400
615
28
62.8%
Name
Connectors
Faces
Struts
Types
Variance
Octahedron 10V
221
400
620
30
119.3%
Octahedron 2V.5V
221
400
620
28
62.8%
Octahedron 5V.2V
221
400
620
24
98.1%
Cube 2V.3V
235
432
666
27
44.4%
Cube 3V.2V
235
432
666
22
52.3%
Cube 6V
235
432
666
29
63.1%
Icosahedron 7V 10/21
246
455
700
15
36.5%
Rhombicuboctahedron 3V 5/8
265
504
768
10
46.2%
Icosahedron 7V 11/21
281
525
805
15
36.5%
Cuboctahedron 2V.3V
307
576
882
34
54.6%
Cuboctahedron 3V.2V
307
576
882
28
53.6%
Cuboctahedron 6V
307
576
882
36
63.1%
Name
Connectors
Faces
Struts
Types
Variance
Truncated Octahedron 4V
313
576
888
25
58.0%
Truncated Octahedron L3
313
576
888
19
55.6%
Cube 7V
316
588
903
42
64.0%
Icosahedron 8V
341
640
980
19
37.7%
Icosahedron L4
341
640
980
14
19.0%
Note: all strut lengths have been sorted by 1/10'000th or +/-0.00005 exact
Amount of Struts vs. Strut Variance
Amount of Struts vs Strut Variance
Note: Click on the graphic, and click "full scale" or scroll down, and press "Print" link at the bottom of the page.
In the graphic you actually see why the Icosahedron looks best, it has the least strut variance, which is an indication of more or less similiar triangles through the entire structure.
And as realized before, the Ln variants additionally provide better results than the nV counterparts.
The Octahedron variants, on the other hand, have high strut variances as seen above.
I personally like the Cuboctahedron variants, but they have more strut variance than the Icosahedron, in other words, at the end it's your personal choice and favours which lead you to choose a polyhedral geodesic dome variant, the list above and this graphic may just assist you in your overall considerations.
Amount of Struts vs. Strut Types
Amount of Struts vs Strut Types
Note: Click on the graphic, and click "full scale" or scroll down, and press "Print" link at the bottom of the page.
In this graphic above the Icosahedron does quite well, with low amount of strut lengths, and again there also Ln provides better results than the nV variants.
Interesting also the Rhombicuboctahedron comes with even lower amount of strut lengths than the Icosahedron.
The amount of different strut lengths has a direct impact on the construction, the lesser the amount of different strut lengths the better - as you have less cut optimization to calculate and therefore less waste to expect.
So it's certainly an aspect to value when choosing a variant to build.
As mentioned already, the struts are sorted in 1/10'000th and you may notice on the details of the variants on the following pages, that you can sum together near the same length struts in case you compose a smaller dome, e.g. < 8m or so.
For large scale domes it may be crucial to remain as precise as you can and I leave it up to you to treat certain struts of alike length as the same or not.
How to Use the Notes
I recommend you choose a dome variant you like to construct ...
look what base appeals to you most, as a first step disregard any other kind of argument
check the amount of different strut types, amount of struts itself - and become aware of the overall overhead (e.g. whether building an edgy 1V or 2V, or a smoother 4V or higher with far more struts)
how temporary shall the dome become? e.g. a 4V Icosahedron Dome skeleton with 250 struts I raise as a single person in 4-5 hours
the higher the subdivision the more exact you need to work, little difference will distort and weaken the construction
... and once you decided which variant(s) you consider more closely, then ...
print out that particular page of the dome variant with your settings - as the notes are subject of change, and may later not be available or available with a different notion
make a 10:1 or 20:1 sized model (e.g. 6m full scale dome, create a 0.60m model), it gives you a sense of the overhead, amount of struts, connectors etc
think about the kind of strut and its connectors you gonna use, e.g. metal, wood, plastic etc and make tests with the actual material, create a 5-way or 6-way connector construction and test its stability
Strut Options & Notion
For each dome variant there is a small calculator, to calculate diameter to the different struts, additionally the lhole can be entered.
Notion of a dome strut (A vs Alath) & lhole
Wooden Strut with Flat Connector
Timber based strut, metallic plate as connector, rather cheap with average labour.
Wooden Strut with Pipe Hub
Pipe Hub Closeup (courtesy by Michal Wielgus)
Timber based strut, with a steel pipe as connector, moderately cheap with average labour, prefereable for more lasting constructions.
Michal Wielgus who sent me the photo used this hub for a 3V 5/9 icosahedron based geodesic dome, he calculated the holes in the pipe for the 5- and 6-way simply by dpipe π / 5 or 6, which was exact enough he said.
For the 4-way connectors on the base require the same calculation as the 6-way, and leaving the two bottom directed connectors empty.
To be more precise each hub would require the angles according, A, B, C, etc ...
Following photos were kindly shared by Haan from Korea, who made a 2V icosahedron based geodesic dome, with 7m diameter, 11cm diameter steel pipe:
Haan's Dome (2v icosa, 7m diameter): hub detail with steel pipe 2008/04/18 09:53
Haan's Dome (2v icosa, 7m diameter): hub detail with steel pipe 2008/04/18 09:58
Haan's Dome (2v icosa, 7m diameter): complete setup 2008/04/18 10:07
Pipe/Tube based Strut
Steel/aluminium/etc tube or pipe, and ends squeezed, also rather cheap with little labour. This options is very popular using conduits.
Desert Domes: Conduit Domes Tips has some useful information on this option.
Bamboo Strut
Bamboo (different diameters) with soft-pipe as connector, very cheap but increased labour, and only suitable for small domes < 4-5m diameter and lower sub-division frequencies (e.g. 2V, 3V), e.g. for play domes.
Cut pointing ends 2007/02/14 12:47
4V Geodesic Dome (6.33m) (Closeup 1) 2007/03/16 16:53
Connector (Closeup) 2007/03/17 11:39
For temporary setups it's obvious to use struts which built-in connectors, e.g. endings which operate as connector.
CONBAM.de, german bamboo expert, has special connectors for more stable and large domes, with a large dome construction example.
Bending the Strut-Endings
Strut Angle αstrut
The angle αstrut can be calculated with a bit of trigonometry.
α shall be the angle between the tangent (green in the illustration) and the strut:
h = √(r2 - lstrut2/4)
h = r * cos(γ/2)
γ = 2 acos(h/r) = 2 acos(√(r2 - lstrut2/4) / r)
α = 90-&beta
β = (180-γ)/2
α = 90 - (180-γ)/2 = γ/2
α = αstrut = acos(√(r2 - lstrut2/4) / r)
finally α is also the angle to bend the endings αstrut.
The following pages with all the variant details provides you for each strut the corresponding αstrut as well.
Detailed Calculation of the Faces or Hub/Strut Angles
Hub/Strut Angles
In case you require the exact angles for the faces, e.g. for a pipe hub or for composing individual faces,
according the SSS Theorem, known all 3 sides of a triangle searching the angles,
we can calculate all angles:
α = acos((B2+C2-A2)/(2 B C))
β = acos((A2+C2-B2)/(2 A C))
γ = acos((A2+B2-C2)/(2 A B))
For now, all the faces are sorted and the angles are given for all variants.
I may add later a list of hubs and their angles, but you can sort them your based on the construction maps.