written by Rene K. Mueller, Copyright (c) 2007, last updated Wed, January 9, 2008

Waterman Polyhedra

Waterman polyhedra exist in mathematics since about 1990, a rather recent discovery.
The concept of Waterman polyhedra was developed by Steve Waterman and relate to "Cubic Close Packing" (CCP) of spheres,
also known as IVM (Isotropic Vector Matrix) by R. Buckminster Fuller.

Spheres are packed in a cubic manner:

x, y and z are integers,

sphere diameter is √2 thereby,

at 0,0,0 resides the first sphere,

and then those removed which have longer vector than √(2*n) from the center (0,0,0) and then a convex hull is calculated which gives a polyhedron:

Waterman W24 O1 (radius √48)

Waterman W24 O1

Some More Examples

Waterman W1 O1 (radius √2)

Waterman W5 O1 (radius √10)

Waterman W24 O1 (radius √48)

Waterman W200 O1 (radius √400)

Waterman W1000 O1 (radius √2000)

Waterman W1 O1

Waterman W5 O1

Waterman W24 O1

Waterman W200 O1

Waterman W1000 O1

Different Origins

Several origins are available as summarized by Mirek Majewski:

Origin

Origin Location

radius

Comment

1

0,0,0

√(2*n)

Atom center: traditional origin of Waterman polyhedra, symmetry properties of a cube.

2

1/2,1/2,0

√(2+4*n)/2

Touch point between 2 atoms: symmetry properties of flat rectangle whose top & bottom faces are the same

3

1/3,1/3,2/3

√(6*(n+1))/3

Void center between 3 atoms: symmetry properties of flat triangle whose top & bottom faces are different

3*

1/3,1/3,1/3

√(3+6*n)/3

Void center between 3 lattice voids: same symmetry of origin 3.

4

1/2,1/2,1/2

√(3+8*(n-1))/2

Tretrahedron void center between 4 atoms: symmetry properties of a tetrahedron.

5

0,0,1/2

√(1+4*n)/2

5 atoms: symmetry properties of a flat rectangle whose top & bottom are different.

6

1,0,0

√(1+2*(n-1))

Octahedral void center between 6 atoms: symmetry properties of a cube.

So the nice thing is, the creation of the polyhedra is done parametrically, in other words, systematically.
Needless to say, there are infinite of Waterman polyhedra, and interestingly there are doubles to be encountered, where:

the same amount of packed spheres result in the same polyhedra (14 + 16 n) m^{2} (whereas n & m integers >= 0)

the final polyhedra from packed spheres result in a previous discovered polyhedra when normalized (e.g. W3 O1 = W24 O1)

Those are not yet removed in the overview which follows.

Platonic & Archimedean Solids vs Waterman Polyhedra

The Waterman Polyhedra (WP) covers also some of the platonic and archimedean solids.
For sake of this comparison the WP are normalized, as W2 O1 has a different size/volume than W1 O6, but the same form of a Octahedron.

Platonic Solids

Waterman W1 O4

Waterman W2 O1

Waterman W2 O6

W1 O3* = W2 O3* = W1 O3 = W1 O4 = Tretrahedron

W2 O1 = W1 O6 = Octahedron

W2 O6 = Cube

Icosahedron and Dodecahedron have no WP representation.

Archimedean Solids

Waterman W1 O1

Waterman W10 O1

Waterman W2 O4

W1 O1 = W4 O1 = Cuboctahedron

W10 O1 = Truncated Octahedron

W4 O3 = W2 O4 = Truncated Tetrahedron

The following look like archimedean solids, but they are not:

Waterman W7 O1

Waterman W3 O1

W7 O1 != Truncated Cuboctahedron

W3 O1 = W12 O1 != Rhombicuboctahedron

as they are not having one length of edge, but two lengths of edges.

The others have no WP representation.

The Generalized Waterman Polyhedra (GWP) are currently still sorted by Steve Waterman, and I will include them later as they may cover more platonic and archimedean solids.

References

Waterman Polyhedron, very informative site by Steve Waterman, the inventor of the Waterman polyhedra

Paul Bourke has also a comprehensive website (I highly recommend to visit), his waterman.c I used to calculate those rendered Waterman polyhedra.

3D Junkyard, vast & interesting collection of links by David Eppstein